Your lenses deserve the very best correctionsĪutomatically correct the defects in your equipment using DxO’s specially designed optical modules. DeepPRIME technology solves these problems before you and better than you. Pure, flawless, and noise-free RAW photosĭxO PureRAW’s artificial intelligence strikes the perfect balance between preserving detail and eliminating noise. Unlock the RAW-file editing capacity of Adobe Photoshop and LightroomĬreate better RAW files before retouching them in Adobe Photoshop, Lightroom, or other programs thanks to DxO’s exclusive demosaicing, denoising, and lens defect correction technologies. The technology is 100% good but the interface is assumning too much situations, and not let to avoid a lot of problems.DxO PureRAW Simply better RAW files, Enhance your RAW files to open up even more possibilities with Adobe Photoshop and Lightroom®. Those are my thoughts after maybe 4000 videos processed. Because maybe the picture is clean… but with deinterlacing artifacts, or maybe is well upscaled, but the aspect ratio is not the right and the picture is squeezed. If we mix concepts, 50% of times the results are not improving the original. The deinterlace have to be only deinterlace) ![]() I think the problem is the interface should show different stepsġ, input pixel aspect (if not 50% of times we are defforming)Ģ deinterlace (independent of enhancing method. If we have to deinterlace and upscale a video with grain we have to use Dione alghoryhtm that is so bad with the grain… And if we selet proteus or Artemis, the upscale is ok and the degrain is ok, but the deinterlace is destroying the results ![]() You are assuming that any video have one problem.īut 90% times the videos have a lot of problems. I want to explain better the issue with the deinterlace.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |